Each installation should be evaluated based on the results of a hazard analysis considering both of these
scenarios. Separation distances as listed in documents such as NFPA 2, Hydrogen Technologies Code, are
a minimum starting point but may need to be adjusted based on analysis. Recent work by NFPA 2 has
also included overpressure criteria, but the consequences can vary depending on…

Documents such as NFPA 2, Hydrogen Technologies Code, and the International Fire Code have quantity thresholds that differentiate requirements for the design of systems and enclosures. However, even the smaller quantities present a hazard under specific conditions, especially for systems that have the potential to release hydrogen into a confined or unvented space. Good engineering judgement…

No, this is not a common or preferred approach. Isolating the source of hydrogen is the best safety practice. Water systems could extinguish the flame but allow the gas to continue leaking and result in an explosion if reignited.

Situations where extinguishing a hydrogen leak prior to stopping flow is safer are rare. Hydrogen releases have a high potential for inadvertent re-ignition and subsequent explosion. Some vent stacks might be equipped with an extinguishing system, but these often can be more hazardous than allowing a properly designed vent stack to continue to burn until the source is isolated.

Releases from high pressure hydrogen systems often make a sound. In those cases, sound might be the
easiest way for a person to know there is a hazard. However, leaks can be relatively small and diffuse,
thereby not making much sound, or alternately large and so loud that they can be very difficult to find. In
both cases, it can be hazardous to move into or through an area.

Dispersion and radiation analysis should be conducted to ensure that the hydrogen cloud will not interfere with the flight path of aircraft. In addition, there may be maximum height requirements due to airport requirements depending on the location of the stack.

Guidance for location of vent stacks is provided by NFPA 2, Hydrogen Technologies Code, which also references CGA G5.5, Hydrogen Vent Systems, for additional guidance. Minimum distances to vent stack outlets should be determined from dispersion and radiation analyses. The height of the vent stack and orientation of the release will affect the minimum separation distance.

There is no consensus on the “correct” answer. Small leaks of short duration have a much lower
probability of ignition compared to large releases. Ignition probability is affected by the operating
conditions, whether the release is from a leak or vent stack, and the surrounding environment. Since the
probability of ignition is high, hazard analyses will usually assume the hydrogen…

Static is a frequent source of ignition attributed to various hydrogen releases. Low levels of static
electricity are sufficient to ignite hydrogen – air mixtures. Static charges can be created by the
atmospheric disturbances and storms, high velocity particles entrained by the gas impacting stationary
objects, and human activity. Grounding of equipment and operators is important to…

After moving people to a safe location, if it safe to do so, isolate the source of hydrogen feeding the fire. Burns and explosions are hazards when exposed to a hydrogen fire. For more best laboratory preventative safety practices as well as first responder response to a hydrogen incident See both CHS training resources: 

• …