The HSP is not aware of any immediate provisions in the IFC or CFC specific to maritime hydrogen fueling, but it would make sense for it to be addressed in either IFC Section 2309, Section 2310, or referenced in both. In NFPA 2, the HSP has not seen any proposals to date; however, anyone who sees a need is encouraged to submit language during the Public Input stage. For example, extensive…

Neither section is a perfect fit for marine hydrogen fueling, but that is often the case with applying Codes. The most prudent approach is to draw from the most relevant provisions of both CFC Sections 2309 and 2310, disregarding requirements that clearly do not align with marine fueling practices. For example, CFC Section 2309 requires a vehicle to be parked on a concrete fueling pad—…

The HSP is not aware of any specific standards for this application, but LNG standards could serve as a useful starting point given the extensive maritime trade of LNG and its use in ship propulsion. Meeting LNG requirements could provide a minimum baseline, with additional considerations needed to account for the colder temperatures of liquid hydrogen (e.g., purging, air liquefaction,…

There are no specific code resources that specifically cover hydrogen liquefaction plants, but they must be built to the general building, electrical, machinery, piping, and mechanical codes for process plants. Codes such as NFPA 2, Hydrogen Technologies Code, for installation and emergency response may also be used for reference. It may also be beneficial to break down the requirements into…

The regulations for electrical classification in Europe and a US jurisdiction such as California are significantly different and should not be assumed to be the same. Consultation with Authorities Having Jurisdiction or a Third- Party expert regarding the application of the US National Electric Code is advised. Some additional important points:

The HSP has concerns with the use of…

The British Standards Institute (BSI) has published BS ISO 22734:2019, a British nationalized version of the packaged water electrolyzer safety certification standard. This standard can be used by a Notified Body (BSI is one of many operating in the UK and in Europe) to certify electrolyzer safety to established norms for this equipment. This standard addresses safety of containerized hydrogen…

The vent system for the excess hydrogen should be vented in accordance with NFPA 2 and CGA G-5.4 and G-5.5. The oxygen also must be vented safely and should be in accordance with NFPA and CGA G-4.4. 

Please be extremely cautious with compressing hydrogen. NEC/NFPA 70 and its Articles 500/505 address electrical equipment in flammable atmospheres. Please also consider the…

Regarding cylinders, it is not necessary to capture the fuse-backed devices which are on the cylinder itself. However, all other relief devices and vent valves must exhaust from a vent system designed in accordance with CGA G-5.5. Also, note that NFPA 2-7.1.17 requires compliance with CGA G-5.5 regardless of storage quantity when the vent system is servicing pressure relief devices. Cylinders…

Panel members have not encountered a device or area classification for ATEX approval within Canada. ATEX is a European Union directive and is not generally recognized within North American standards. The second link below references a UL similarity. https://news.nilfiskcfm.com/2017/03/atex-certification-applicable-north-america/;    https://www.ul.com/services/atex-certification-…

These distances are based primarily on hydrogen piping releases and resultant vapor clouds and jet flames based on pipe diameter and pressure. It’s important to note that many facilities have issues such as confinement and congestion, so it may be applicable to apply contemporary engineering models to assess risk.