The HSP is not aware of any immediate provisions in the IFC or CFC specific to maritime hydrogen fueling, but it would make sense for it to be addressed in either IFC Section 2309, Section 2310, or referenced in both. In NFPA 2, the HSP has not seen any proposals to date; however, anyone who sees a need is encouraged to submit language during the Public Input stage. For example, extensive…

Neither section is a perfect fit for marine hydrogen fueling, but that is often the case with applying Codes. The most prudent approach is to draw from the most relevant provisions of both CFC Sections 2309 and 2310, disregarding requirements that clearly do not align with marine fueling practices. For example, CFC Section 2309 requires a vehicle to be parked on a concrete fueling pad—…

The HSP is not aware of any specific standards for this application, but LNG standards could serve as a useful starting point given the extensive maritime trade of LNG and its use in ship propulsion. Meeting LNG requirements could provide a minimum baseline, with additional considerations needed to account for the colder temperatures of liquid hydrogen (e.g., purging, air liquefaction,…

Assuming this question relates to the roof of the enclosure, there are no design criteria on this topic to the Panel’s knowledge. The key to the design would be ensure that the exhaust ventilation inlet is located at the highest point and that there are no pockets that can capture hydrogen (restrict flow to the exhaust inlet).

Information on Toyota’s repair garage approach is available…

A best practice, even for small hydrogen vents, is to vent to a dedicated vent system outside the building where possible. Several international codes and standards can be used to provide guidance; the Panel recommends discussing the configuration with a local fire official to ensure their required standards are followed. In the U.S. NFPA 2, Hydrogen Technologies Code, has information in…

It is always recommended that the area in which this work would be done be adequately ventilated and in accordance with the Building Code, NFPA 2 and NFPA 45 if applicable. In the Panel’s opinion, it’s recommended that the weight measuring equipment as you’ve described it  be designed for Class 1, Group B, Division 2. Also consult with the local authority having jurisdiction as to the…

While HSP members have limited experience with MFCs in experimental setups, the Panel does not consider them to be reliable to provide a positive flow shutoff. For safety, a shutoff valve in series is recommended. Projects will also need to consider hazardous electrical rating and location when flowing H2. Regarding Coriolis mass flow measuring devices, Coriolis flow meters measure mass rate…

It is difficult to provide trustworthy answers to these questions without understanding the design and configuration of the specific installation. It may be best to consult with a pressure systems expert to evaluate the specific installation and uses. The gas provider may also be a good resource for specifics on gas equipment use. Other beneficial resources include the…

If liquid hydrogen usage is sufficiently high at the fueling station, there may be no need to vent any boiloff generated from the LH2 storage tank. Boil-off gas should be minimized through system design, but where needed, the boil-off hydrogen along with any other hydrogen released must be vented through a local vent stack which is constructed to safely vent the hydrogen in accordance with CGA…

Example safety guidelines are listed below but may not be all-inclusive (e.g., they do not cover general practices such as lockout/tagout, management of change, job safety analysis), and most are the same as for gaseous hydrogen. Also reference NFPA 2 and CGA documents such as H-3, H-5, and H-7. Additional safety training material can also be found on the following link to courses and…