Introduce the Hydrogen Safety Panel (HSP)Introduce key hydrogen safety resources that are availableOpen discussion on your hydrogen safety issues and needsExplore how the HSP can help the safe rollout of hydrogen and fuel cell technologiesIdentify projects that could utilize the HSP for impactful safety reviews

PNNL’s Hydrogen Safety ProgramWhy Hydrogen Fuel?Hydrogen – A Clean, Flexible Energy CarrierWhy Fuel Cells? H2@scale: Enabling Affordable, Reliable, Clean, and Secure Energy Across SectorsUpward trend with global fuel cell shipments 2018 U.S. Snapshot More details in Slides

Hydrogen Safety Panel, Safety Knowledge Tools, and First Responder Training Resources 

Natural gas was first used as a vehicle fuel as far back as the 1930s. The first natural gas vehicles, which ran on uncompressed natural gas, were called “gas bag” vehicles and were used to combat gasoline shortages during World War I [1]. During and after World War II, compressed natural gas (CNG) vehicles using fuel tanks mounted on the roof gained popularity in France and Italy [2]. Today, there are more than 24 million CNG vehicles in service worldwide, including CNG buses that continue the early tradition of mounting fuel tanks on the roof.  

The HSP has reviewed many safety plans for gaseous hydrogen. An emerging trend is the use of liquid (cryogenic) hydrogen in the commercial market, potentially near residential areas, for fueling hydrogen fuel cell vehicles. Finding a “qualified” person to determine liquid hydrogen code compliance is difficult, and the skills necessary of such an individual are not well defined in the codes and standards.

The ignition of a hydrogen-air mixture that has engulfed a typical set of ambient vaporizers (i.e., an array of finned tubes) may result in a deflagration-to-detonation transition (DDT). Simplified curve-based vapor cloud explosion (VCE) blast load prediction methods, such as the Baker-Strehlow-Tang (BST) method, would predict a DDT given that typical ambient vaporizerswould be rated as medium or high congestion and hydrogen is a high reactivity fuel (i.e., high laminar burning velocity).

This Technical Memorandum was originally prepared as an Annex on the topic of Hydrogen Embrittlement for the AIAA Guide to Safety of Hydrogen and Hydrogen Systems (G-095-2004), then in revision [1]. The Guide establishes a uniform NASA process for hydrogen system design, materials selection operation, storage and transportation, and represents a broad collection of aerospace acumen.

The aim of the present work is to assess the risk of explosion in closed containments used for the transportation of nuclear materials or nuclear waste. Indeed, it is very well known that hydrogen can be produced due to (i) the radiolysis of different materials within the containment, (ii) the thermal decomposition of mainly the organic part in the containment. Since hydrogen has a very low ignition energy and a very wide flammability domain, it is important to determine the risk of ignition of the subsequent mixture produced by the aforementioned mechanisms.

In collaboration with Parker Hannifin Corporation, the Fire Safety Branch of the FAA conducted testing to evaluate the effects of three potential failure conditions of hydrogen proton exchange (or polymer electrolyte) membrane fuel cell stacks supplied by Nuvera Fuel Cells. The three conditions examined were a loss of coolant to the stack, short circuit, and a crossflow condition.

VIII.6  Hydrogen Safety Panel, Safety Knowledge Tools and First Responder Training Resources